Changing Roles Responsibilities Traditional -Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Changing Roles Responsibilities Traditional? Answer: Introduction Michael Chiozza is the chairman of the company and that company works in the power generation, mining sector and information technology and he shows disappointment as the executive staff of the company has failed to implement to any project methodology (Larson and Gray 2013). He has ordered to implement a project methodology. This presentation will highlight agile project methodology and its various aspects by which Michael Chiozzas company can be greatly benefitted. The lifecycle associates the following phases-initiation, planning, execution, control and closure. Lifecycle of Agile Project Management The first step involves the initiation. auditing, the strategy behind the execution of the project is discussed. Here the team selection is done (Tripathi and Goyal 2014). It is the responsibility of the respective enterprise to appoint a project manager who can assist them in building a project methodology that can enhance the projects they undertake. The next phase contains the planning for the project. The planning contains the detailed breakdown of the project tasks and the risks have been analysed and based on the risks proper management is scheduled and based on that the mitigation procedures are initiated (Conforto et al 2014). Execution and Control The planned objectives are implemented in this phase and it is noticed whether the project methodologies are properly followed or not, whether the project is properly getting executed tested and gets reviewed. If everything is fine the project further proceeds. If any failure incurs then the failures are assessed and then the control measures are taken to mitigate those risks within and after all that the final testing is performed whether the whole task or the whole project has worked well accordingly or not (Layton and Ostermiller 2017). Thus the productivity can be measured. The executive officer must implement this project methodology as this can assist in bringing the maximum productivity of the company. This can also assure that the project has been done in accounting with the agile project methodology and the project has been successful so far and it is expected that it will complete successfully. A written document must be prepared to support the project (Schwalbe 2015). The formal document must contain the formal acceptance that the final Project Methodologies Policies and Procedures Project Methodologies Policies The project management methodologies contain the following responsibilities- Corporate Responsibility The project manager is responsible to cater the following policies- Efficient implementation of the policy Continual delivery of service Consult with the employees on the management of the ongoing project and should take decision accordingly (Serrador and Pinto 2015). Management Responsibility Here the project manager is responsible to detect whether the project is performed in accordance with the compliance of the agile project methodology (Hoda and Murugesan 2016). It must be ensured that the employees are working in accordance with the project methodologies if it is not followed then the project will fail miserably. Employee Responsibility It must be ensured that the procedures followed within the office premises must be reasonable and are appropriate. The employees should have sound knowledge of the respective methodologies and should work on it accordingly. That can result in maximum productivity. of the company (Lin et al. 2014). The employees should communicate with each other, the discussion should be constructive and should be project focused. Standardization of project methodology procedures The agile working style involves the fast and efficient performance of a project in collaboration with the managers and the employees. Both the managers and the employees should be aware of the standards and they must follow the standards only then a project can execute successfully (Chou, Tzeng and Yu 2015). The working deadline, the working patterns and varied arrangement for the project must be taken into consideration in this procedure. Criteria to be used for the working arrangements All the employees of the organisations must abide by the regulations of agile methodology and should agree to all the factors and the aspects of the agile methodology. The manager and employees should consider the factors and should agree with those project methodologies factors (Kerzner 2013). Only the cooperation between the employees and the managers can assist to conduct the business in agile and effective manner. The factors that everyone should look upon- The capability to meet the customer demand. The work performance and the quality of work. The financial considerations It should be considered that the project can be carried out inside the office premises or outside the office premises (pundak 2014). The employees who are willing to take the agile project related tasks must discuss with the superiors and then must start to work on the project. Communication and contact The managers and the employees must stay in contact with each other as that can enhance the relationship between the two (Martinelli and Milosevic 2016). The appropriate channels must be developed to facilitate the communication and this can enhance the project quality. Agile Project Methodologies Mechanism The Agile Project methodology contains the following methodologies- Agile Scrum Methodology: sprints, roles and artifacts The agile project methodology is based upon the systematic interactions and the three major roles must be considered- The Team, The Scrum Master and the Product Owner. The Scrum Master is the primary figure of the project and he takes the maximum responsibility to remove all the barriers and the issues relevant to the project and that can assist to confirm the project in an effective manner. The Product Owner is generally the stakeholder who caters the feedback in time for the product or the project thus helps to execute the project in a more efficient manner (Conforto and Amaral 2016). The Scrum Master is the team who implements the product and the project execution. The Project Team must contain seven members and they are focused onto cater the flexible and the productive service. Sprint is the short development cycle that is necessary to develop a shippable product increment. The sprint usually takes one to four weeks time to execute the project (Machado, Pinheiro and Tamanini 2015). The Scrum is basically dependent on the three main artifacts and they are used to arrange the requirements and track the progress of Sprint burndown chart, product backlog and the sprint backlog. Kanban Kanban the powerful initiative that enhances the development of the software products. Once the team gets completed the team can take the next project arranged in the timeline (Floricel et al. 2014). The development procedures of the project can be greatly embellished by work in progress (WIP) that is prioritized by Kanban. The development procedures offer more flexibility better and agile turnaround, clear objectives and the transparency (Leach 2014). Scrum requires the fixed iterations but Kanban does not require any kind of fixed iterations. The development of the project is based on the workflow visualisation of Kanban board. Eliminating waste in software engineering Lean is another used agile approach and is used in the physical manufacturing procedures. It basically depends on the seven principles- Elimination of waste Delivery as fast as possible Empowering the team Building integrity and quality (Galvan et al. 2015) Enhance knowledg Decide as late as possible The requirements for continued professional development for project team members and rest of the staffs The enterprise must adopt the agile approach that has been successful in recent times and the companies have been benefitted by the Agile approach (Conforto et al. 2016). Michael Chiozza' company must adopt the agile approach that has been proved successful. That approach can enhance the productivity of the company. The Agile Project management and DSDM Atern have initiated the certification procedures and this certification can assist many aspirants who are willing to take up job in the field of project management and also those who are working on the project and wants to embellish the project quality (Dyb, Dingsyr and Moe 2014). The certification procedures can assist in the recruitment procedures, it can help to filter and identify the human resource pool for hiring. The Agile Project Management can improve the working process of the company, thus the employees should have sound knowledge of the agile project methodology. Thus they should learn from the educators the various aspects of Agile Project methodology so that they can apply the thoughts on the live project of the company (Kautz, Johansen and Uldahl 2014). The employees can learn from the certifications as well. This can enhance the confidence of the employees as well. Recognised best practice: The Project managers can take the effective decision for their companys projects, this can save a lot of time and this can also increase the productivity (Conforto et al. 2014). The following of project methodology can help them to build a healthy relationship with the employees as well and this can enhance better understanding between them as well. Conclusion It can be concluded from the above discourse that the agile project methodology can help them to achieve the desired productivity. The project methodology can enhance decision-making, can increase the workforce's efficiency. The presentation has highlighted the lifecycle of the Agile project methodology, has also focused on the policies and the procedures of the agile methodologies, the standardization of policies and procedures. The mechanism has also been grandstand in the project as well. Lastly, how agile methodology can embellish the professional development cycle has been detailed in the presentation. References Chou, S.Y., Tzeng, G.H. and Yu, C.C., 2015, July. A Novel Hybrid Multiple Attribute Decision marketing Procedure for Aspired Agile Application. InISPE CE(pp. 152-161). Conforto, E.C. and Amaral, D.C., 2016. Agile project management and stage-gate modelA hybrid framework for technology-based companies.Journal of Engineering and Technology Management,40, pp.1-14. Conforto, E.C., Amaral, D.C., da Silva, S.L., Di Felippo, A. and Kamikawachi, D.S.L., 2016. The agility construct on project management theory.International Journal of Project Management,34(4), pp.660-674. Conforto, E.C., Salum, F., Amaral, D.C., da Silva, S.L. and de Almeida, L.F.M., 2014. Can agile project management be adopted by industries other than software development?.Project Management Journal,45(3), pp.21-34. Crowder, J.A. and Friess, S., 2015.Agile project management: managing for success. Springer International Publishing. Dyb, T., Dingsyr, T. and Moe, N.B., 2014. Agile project management. InSoftware project management in a changing world(pp. 277-300). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Floricel, S., Bonneau, C., Aubry, M. and Sergi, V., 2014. Extending project management research: Insights from social theories.International Journal of Project Management,32(7), pp.1091-1107. Galvan, S., Mora, M., OConnor, R.V., Acosta, F. and Alvarez, F., 2015. A compliance analysis of agile methodologies psychology ISO/IEC 29110 project management process.Procedia Computer Science,64, pp.188-195. Hoda, R. and Murugesan, L.K., 2016. Multi-level agile project management challenges: A self-organizing team perspective.Journal of Systems and Software,117, pp.245-257. Kautz, K., Johansen, T.H. and Uldahl, A., 2014, June. Creating business value through agile project management and information systems development: The perceived impact of Scrum. InInternational Working Conference on Transfer and Diffusion of IT(pp. 150-165). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Kerzner, H., 2013.Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley Sons. Larson, E.W. and Gray, C., 2013.Project Management: The Managerial Process with MS Project. McGraw-Hill. Layton, M.C. and Ostermiller, S.J., 2017.Agile project management for dummies. John Wiley Sons. Leach, L.P., 2014.Critical chain project management. Artech House. Lin, J., Yu, H., Shen, Z. and Miao, C., 2014, September. Studying task allocation decisions of novice agile teams with data from agile project management tools. InProceedings of the 29th ACM/IEEE international conference on Automated software engineering(pp. 689-694). ACM. Machado, T.C.S., Pinheiro, P.R. and Tamanini, I., 2015. Project management aided by verbal decision analysis approaches: a case study for the selection of the best SCRUM practices.International Transactions in Operational Research,22(2), pp.287-312. Martinelli, R.J. and Milosevic, D.Z., 2016.Project management toolbox: tools and techniques for the practicing project manager. John Wiley Sons. Schwalbe, K., 2015.Information technology project management. Cengage Learning. Serrador, P. and Pinto, J.K., 2015. Does Agile work?A quantitative analysis of agile project success.International Journal of Project Management,33(5), pp.1040-1051. pundak, M., 2014. Mixed agile/traditional project management methodologyreality or illusion?.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,119, pp.939-948. Tripathi, V. and Goyal, A.K., 2014. Changing Roles and Responsibilities from Traditional project management to Agile project management.International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication ISSN, pp.2321-8169.